News Update

Here is an article from today’s New York Times. It recounts the attack of a town in the Darfur region by the janjaweed, who, using guns and bombs, killed dozens of civilians and resulted in many missing. While the government claims the raid was aimed at rebel groups, civilians of the town say that the rebel groups had been long gone from the region.

Those in the region state that this recent violence on the part of the janjaweed reflects the new phase in the genocide in Darfur in that it is an all-out attack on rebel groups by the government, through a “scorched-earth campagin”.

There have been connections with Chad as well, because rebel groups stationed in Darfur have been trying to overthrow the government that has been causing a lot of insecurity an instability in the area.

Please read this article, copied below, and comment on it or keep in mind these events for committee, and use them in your resolution-writing and caucusing. Focus on the role of rebel groups in Darfur, as aiding overthrowing of the janjaweed or causing more deaths and the government to be even more corrupt.

Scorched-Earth Strategy Returns to Darfur

Lynsey Addario for The New York Times

Hawar Omar Muhammad was among the Suleia residents terrorized by the militias, known as the janjaweed, and bombs dropped by government planes. More Photos >

 

Article Tools Sponsored By

Published: March 2, 2008

SULEIA, Sudan — The janjaweed are back.

Skip to next paragraph

Multimedia

The Faces of War in SudanPhotographs

The Faces of War in Sudan

 

Enlarge This Image

Lynsey Addario for The New York Times

Halima Muhammad Dawar in Suleia, Sudan, after government forces and allied militias burned the town last month. More Photos »

They came to this dusty town in the Darfur region of Sudan on horses and camels on market day. Almost everybody was in the bustling square. At the first clatter of automatic gunfire, everyone ran.

The militiamen laid waste to the town — burning huts, pillaging shops, carrying off any loot they could find and shooting anyone who stood in their way, residents said. Asha Abdullah Abakar, wizened and twice widowed, described how she hid in a hut, praying it would not be set on fire.

“I have never been so afraid,” she said.

The attacks by the janjaweed, the fearsome Arab militias that came three weeks ago, accompanied by government bombers and followed by the Sudanese Army, were a return to the tactics that terrorized Darfur in the early, bloodiest stages of the conflict.

Such brutal, three-pronged attacks of this scale — involving close coordination of air power, army troops and Arab militias in areas where rebel troops have been — have rarely been seen in the past few years, when the violence became more episodic and fractured. But they resemble the kinds of campaigns that first captured the world’s attention and prompted the Bush administration to call the violence in Darfur genocide.

Aid workers, diplomats and analysts say the return of such attacks is an ominous sign that the fighting in Darfur, which has grown more complex and confusing as it has stretched on for five years, is entering a new and deadly phase — one in which the government is planning a scorched-earth campaign against the rebel groups fighting here as efforts to find a negotiated peace founder.

The government has carried out a series of coordinated attacks in recent weeks, using air power, ground forces and, according to witnesses and peacekeepers stationed in the area, the janjaweed, as their allied militias are known here. The offensives are aimed at retaking ground gained by a rebel group, the Justice and Equality Movement, which has been gathering strength and has close ties to the government of neighboring Chad.

Government officials say that their strikes have been carefully devised to hit the rebels, not civilians, and that Arab militias were not involved. They said they had been motivated to evict the rebels in part because the rebels were hijacking aid vehicles and preventing peacekeepers from patrolling the area, events that some aid workers and peacekeepers confirmed.

“We are simply trying to secure the area from the bandits that are troubling civilians in the area,” said Ali al-Sadig, a government spokesman. “There is nothing abnormal about a government doing this.”

But residents of the towns said the rebels had been long gone by the time the government attacks began, leaving defenseless civilians to flee bombs and guns. In interviews, survivors of the attacks described a series of assaults that had left dozens dead, turned large sections of towns into hut-shaped circles of ash and scattered tens of thousands of fearful residents, including hundreds of children, who fled classrooms in the middle of a school day and have not been reunited with their families.

“My son Ahmed, he ran, but I have not seen him since,” said a woman named Aisha as she waited for a sack of sorghum from United Nations workers in Sirba, one of the towns that was attacked. “I just pray he is still hiding in the bush somewhere and will come back to me.”

A Terrorized Population

The United Nations estimates that the recent fighting has forced about 45,000 people to flee their homes in Darfur, which is roughly the size of Texas and has a population of about six million people. Some fled to Chad, where they have not been able to reach the safety of refugee camps because of continued bombing along the border. Others fled to Jebel Moun, a rebel stronghold to the east, and aid workers fear for the safety of about 20,000 people who are in the path of future attacks if the government presses ahead with its offensive and the rebels vow to resist.

Military officials from the peacekeeping force in Darfur said in recent days that the Sudanese military had added nearly a brigade of troops to West Darfur, along with two dozen tanks and armored vehicles and many heavy weapons.

“You see a buildup from both sides,” said Ameerah Haq, the senior United Nations aid official in Sudan. “Both sides must desist. We have a population that is just being attacked and hit from both sides.”

Skip to next paragraph

 

Enlarge This Image

Lynsey Addario for The New York Times

Nigerian soldiers with the hybrid peacekeeping force in Darfur sponsored by the United Nations and the African Union on a patrol in Suleia last week. More Photos >

Multimedia

The Faces of War in SudanPhotographs

The Faces of War in Sudan

The New York Times

Suleia and nearby towns have been burned and pillaged. More Photos >

 

Enlarge This Image

Lynsey Addario for The New York Times

International aid organizations distributed food and cooking oil last week in Suleia, Sudan, after attacks by government forces and Arab militias. More Photos >

 

Enlarge This Image

Lynsey Addario for The New York Times

Hawar Omar Muhammad was among the Suleia residents terrorized by the militias, known as the janjaweed, and bombs dropped by government planes. More Photos >

Pressure is mounting on Sudan over Darfur. In January, a long-sought hybrid United Nations and African Union peacekeeping force began working in Darfur, but the Sudanese government’s quibbling over which countries the troops will come from and bureaucratic delays have stalled the force’s deployment.

Sudan’s biggest trading partner and ally, China, has also come under pressure from advocates who have linked the Olympic Games in Beijing this summer to the fighting in Darfur. China has been more publicly critical of the Sudanese government in recent weeks. Sudan has also been trying to improve its relationship with the United States, and last week, President Bush’s new special envoy to Sudan, Richard S. Williamson, visited Darfur and the Sudanese capital, Khartoum, meeting with President Omar al-Bashir. Any improvement in relations, he said, would be contingent on tangible improvements in the humanitarian situation.

“Since the first of the year another 75,000 people in Darfur have been displaced,” Mr. Williamson said in a telephone interview. “That is more than a thousand a day. There are not going to be any changes until that reverses.”

Origins of a Conflict

Despite the pressure, the government seems determined to fight on, and the most powerful rebel groups — the biggest factions of the Justice and Equality Movement and the Sudanese Liberation Army — have refused to sit down for talks. So the violence continues, tracing a familiar arc as it wears on.

It was five years ago last week that an attack by rebels from non-Arab tribes like the Fur, Masalit and Zaghawa, seeking greater wealth and autonomy for the neglected and impoverished region of Darfur, prompted the Arab-dominated government to marshal Arab militias in the region that ultimately evicted millions from their homes, burning, looting and raping along the way. The campaign effectively pushed many non-Arab people off their land and into vast, squalid camps across Darfur and Chad.

In the first two years of the conflict, 2003 and 2004, joint attacks by the Sudanese Army, janjaweed militiamen and the government’s old Russian-made Antonov bombers terrorized Darfur, waging a brutal counterinsurgency against non-Arab rebel groups by attacking their fellow tribesmen in their villages. At least 200,000 are believed to have died as a result of the violence or sickness and hunger caused by the crisis, according to international estimates, with the majority of violent deaths in that period.

But in the past two years, the conflict has grown more complex and chaotic, and while some coordinated attacks by janjaweed militias and aerial bombardment have occurred, they were not of the same scale or intensity. But Darfur has remained a deadly place.

In 2006, before a peace agreement and then in the aftermath of its failure, rebel groups fractured and began fighting among themselves. Hundreds of thousands of people were displaced and hundreds died as a result of their battles. Today, according to some estimates, two dozen rebel groups are jockeying for territory and influence in Darfur. Some analysts and human rights workers say the government has sown chaos by splintering the rebel groups to weaken them.

In 2007, Arab tribes, some of which had allied with the government and some of which had taken up arms to fight the rebels, also began to fight one another. Many of the violent deaths of 2007 were caused by these bloody battles between Arab groups and their militias, according to aid workers and diplomats in the region.

But as the conflict enters its sixth year, an older, deadly pattern is returning, and with it fears are rising among villagers, aid workers, diplomats and analysts that Darfur is headed for a new cycle of bloodletting and displacement on a vast scale.

In recent weeks, bombs dropped from government planes hit Abu Surouj, Sirba, Suleia and other towns in West Darfur, then came janjaweed militiamen, who killed, raped and burned, helping themselves to livestock and grain, furniture and clothing. In one town, the raiders pried the corrugated metal roof off a school, aid workers said. In another, water pumps were destroyed.

“This is the kind of destruction that makes it hard for people to return,” said Ted Chaiban, the Unicef representative in Sudan, who has toured the area of the attacks. “People need security. They are totally vulnerable.”

Violence in Chad

The recent violence in Chad, where rebel groups with bases in Sudan tried to topple the government in early February, has worsened matters. Rebels in Darfur, who diplomats and analysts say have received arms and cash from the family of Chad’s president, Idriss Déby, rushed into Chad to help defend him, creating a vacuum in the territory they had occupied. Sudan’s government seized the opportunity to retake the ground and now appears to be pushing farther into areas long held by the rebels, according to peacekeepers stationed here.

Few people in the region were unhappy to see the Justice and Equality Movement evicted. Banditry was rife in the territory it controlled, and for months aid groups had dodged carjackings and other attacks. African Union peacekeepers had been barred from the area, according to Brig. Gen. Balla Keita, the new regional commander of the hybrid United Nations-African Union force in West Darfur.

“They were causing a lot of insecurity,” General Keita said of the rebels, but he added that this did not justify attacks on heavily populated areas.

In Suleia, only a few hundred residents remained of the 15,000 who had lived here. Those left behind were too weak to run and have sought safety near the army camp at the edge of town, sleeping in the open, huddled together for warmth against the frigid night winds.

The Sudanese soldiers here have promised to protect them from militiamen who still roam the edges of town. They prevented militiamen from stealing sacks of grain delivered by aid groups, residents said.

Adam Adoum Abdullah, a former rebel fighter who joined the Sudanese Army as part of a peace deal with one rebel group in 2006, commandeered an army truck to help collect what little food, blankets and bits of shelter remained in the town for those sleeping out in the cold next to the army camp.

“I am ashamed that the janjaweed come with the soldiers,” Mr. Abdullah said. “What kind of army are we to fight like this? These people, they are suffering. We must help them.”

4 Responses to “News Update”

  1. Claudia Vasquez Says:

    Germany full-heartedly sees the United Nations appeasing approach to pleasing President Omar-Bashir as having not moved is one step closer to preventing the six million graves from being freshly dug. Nations must look back at history and realize that it is definitely being repeated with the Holocaust, Rwanada, and Uganda standing as our strongest prime examples. When crimes against humanity are in effect it is up to we nations to intervene and especially prevent Sudan’s practices of belligerent fundamentalism from accumulating. The worst part is that thousands of defenseless individuals are fleeing their very own home due to these random massive attacks and are being reduced to the lowest standards of living while they are solely relying on our humanitarian aid for assistance. This article not only emphasizes the greed, impunity and political exclusion deriving from the Sudanese government but it even helps illustrate the intensity of this pressing issue. Therefore Germany stands to emphasize our final solutionto putting an end to these atrocities- we must use FORCE and lead these desperate individuals away from these treacherous scortching-soil practices and to safety. As long as this force is accountable, multilateral and has its intentions into halting this current suffering than nations can be rest assured that peace and stability will be in a closer grasp than we have all dared to imagine.

  2. Roya Shahnazari Says:

    China strongly believes that United Nations interference is necessary, however keeps in mind the sovereignty of each individual country. This article has highlighted the atrocities occurring within Darfur; thus, exemplifying the need for foreign help and influence with the Sudanese government. Using force against a country’s government will often end in a disastrous way. Rather than using force, China has proposed many other feesable solutions. Being that China and Sudan have many great economic bonds, China has worked to influence the Sudanese government into taking action against the genocide. This was noted as the first time in 35 years that China has influenced another country into taking peacekeepers amongst their soil. The Chinese government has recently convinced the Sudanese government to allow United Nations peacekeepers to protect civilians. China also strongly urges humanitarian aid being provided for those civilians who have been injured. China hopes to protect all civilians at risk in this atrocity, and urges all countries to keep a moderate mind set and use influence as opposed to force.

    -China

  3. Ashley Vogeli (South Africa) Says:

    Through this article it is important to acknowledge that the issues in Darfur are still present, and need to be addressed immediately. The level of support being lent to the people of Darfur is shocking and unacceptable. As the delegation of South Africa, we believe that now more than ever, in order to stop the killing of more innocent civilians we, as surrounding nations, need to step in. It has become clear through the numerous insurgent groups fighting, that force has become necessary in order to discontinue the conflict. The first step towards gaining a resolution is getting the fighting to discontinue and begin maintaining peace. In order for the fighting to discontinue, the enablers to the rebels need to stop providing arms. A realistic first step towards peace in the region is the discontinuation of arms being prominent in the country. A combination of pressure and sanctions is a vital amalgamation from outside parties needed to reprimand those providing funding and fuel for this war. South Africa has long been known for stepping up against other countries on the issues surrounding human rights. As we get closer to our conference we need to realize that there is still a crisis in Darfur and we can stop the killing of more innocent citizens if we take action now.

  4. Tiffany Cheng [Japan] Says:

    Ever since the breaking of war in 2003, the Darfur conflict has remained a main concern of the international community due to the the mounting death toll and continuation of nonstop violence between rebel groups and government army in conjunction with Arab militias. As the article pointed out, a major worry is the targeting of peaceful civilians by both the Sudanese government and rebel groups although they have remained neutral throughout the conflict. Because of the attacks launched upon them, these groups often lose access to needed humanitarian aid and other daily essentials for survival. Japan supports and promotes achieving human rights in all countries as a top priority therefore as delegates from Japan, we feel that it is of utmost importance to mobilize much needed humanitarian aid to the needy civilians of Darfur and then solve the rest of the conflict from there on. As a part of a three part solution, Japan feels that a basic ceasefire would be critical in first stopping the violence so that the the second key idea, needed humanitarian aid can be mobilized and accessed by the needy civilians. With the ceasefire, groups like an AU/UN hybrid can also be admitted into Darfur to protect the civilians from further harm and violations. From then on, rebel groups and the government can then make progressive steps towards ending the violence once and for all and settle upon a peace treaty that is attractive to both sides.
    Japan would also like to point out in agreement to the article the blurred lines in this conflict. There is no longer a defined “good” or “bad” as both the rebel groups and government forces have commited crimes and greatly damaged the health of Darfur. Both groups have contributed to the death rates and violence, therefore neither group can be directly targeted as the “bad” side and consequences applied should be laid equally upon the two groups. Japan would also like to note the importance of increasing humanitarian aid and ending this conflict immediately as the warfare has already spread over the borders to the neighboring Chad. If relief and assistance is not administered immediately, the conflict could spread west and turn into a pan-African war, greatly endangering the health of a whole continent.

Leave a Reply